Problem with the warning system..?

Sour_skittlez7 has only 1 warning, and 4 bans related to disrespectful comments/swearing, which the next ban will be permanent

Afonsokiller295 has had made sexual references/comments in chat, threatened to hack, and has claimed to have hacked (3 warnings). He has been banned only 3 times, and I am not 100% sure what his next ban will be.

T_Rex34 has gotten 2 warnings, and 2 bans.

Tourex has gotten 1 warning, and 1 ban.

Easports has gotten 4 warnings, and no bans.

6985jjorda has no warnings, and 1 ban.

Vaderdawg has 1 warning and 1 ban

I have 3 warnings, and 2 bans

Antineutron has a warning for "Deleting items from a higher staff member". I don't know the situation, but sounds like he was doing his job if he was deleting items that were from a staff member.

I counted notes as warnings (Unless they were something that isn't really something that can be warned for, such as the "64 year old man looking for young chicks" note) as that is pretty much what they are being used for at this point. "Not being so kind" would be something that people should be warned for.

This was just to show how this system is not very organized. Everything from August was included, as that was when people started getting punished. Maybe something should be done, considering someone who got 4 warnings does not have a single ban, yet someone with 1 warning is facing a permanent ban..



It just don' make sense bruh

By your logic, me saying I will ddos some kid is okay because I don't have anything to support my claim. Threats should be taken a lot more seriously than that. And he has done it more than twice.

The ban system was reset. It does not matter what they had previously done, what matters is what they have currently done. You pretty much told me staff are punishing people based on past experiences, and you are basing the punishments on the alternate accounts off of what happens on the main accounts.

Looke shouldn't be be trolling people, nor would I consider that anything punishable if a staff member is harassing a player. If you didn't consent to it prior, and you told her to stop and she didn't, Anti did the right thing. But that's just me.

The comments section is used for staff to read back on when it is necessary, yet you told me that stuff don't use it for bans, so the only thing it is used for is pretty much Staff Applications.

The warnings system is in place to warn people. There should be no need for verbal warnings, as warnings don't actually do anything. Also, the way I look at it, your chastising them on their first 3 offenses. An analogy of it would be basically you being a police officer, and a guy who broke the rule is speeding. Don't you think the guy is still going to get a ticket for speeding despite it being his first time doing it? He will still get punished for it, yet you seem to lightly rap the ruler across his knuckles.

There should be a ban ratio, considering someone who has sworn a lot has 4 bans, yet someone who has lied to staff, said inappropriate things in chat, caused fights in TS, and was not being nice to people got off-scot free.

Warnings don't do anything if you don't use them..

You are contradicting yourself. "There are other factors that come into play as, like the USERS HISTORY." Using that specific word, being "History", means you just admitted you do base it on things prior to the ban reset. And just in case, here is the definition of History: "The whole series of past events connected with someone or something."
And Sour is still getting banned for doing less. Afonso has more warnings, and the same amount of bans of which Sour has. Why is it SHE gets permabanned next time she does something?

Even what Jade there said my point. People are using Comments as warnings, instead of just giving them a warn. And yet again with the basing things off of things prior to the ban reset. Sure, it may be important when selecting staff, but you are still undeniably basing things prior to the ban reset.

Harassment was something I have not been warned for. I have been warned for "Cussing in public chat", "Saying inappropriate things in chat", and "A warning about the way he acts on TS". If you really wish to claim something, then be diplomatic. And about DM being warned about that stuff, You're head staff. Set an example for the new ones, it is your job after all. Screwing around and trolling is pretty much throwing it out there as "It is okay to do this", even if Jade was not bothered by the powertooling.

This post even proves your intentions were ill, as you were purposely trying to annoy her.

Tod I like how you are trying to get me banned HA whats funny is I havent been on the server in a wile. I found my old buddy AKA Enemy on some other server so you myfriend need to chill your pills mannnn

Ea I need you back in my life

Yeah I mean Looke just plays around with the power tool. It doesn't bother the people she does it to. She's done it to me but it's not a big deal. All I am saying is that the new ban system is better than the old. The staff knows what they are doing and that's what matters. I you don't get it then don't worry about it.

I don't appreciate your sarcasm, and even then, trolling is trolling which should be dealt with. Also, instead of attacking players, be diplomatic. And actually talk about the topic. I could care less about what happens to you or your girlfriend as I don't value either of you as much in my head anymore; so leave your issues out of the current situation and stay on topic.

The main reason I made this post is because it isn't organized, as you can tell above. Their little "Incident" was just another thing I discovered, and they are getting upset because I provided the information that it could be classified as abuse. Even then, all they are saying is "It isn't abuse, I am dating her so it is okay".

If the staff know how to work it and deal with it why does it matter?

It matters due to the fact that it lacks real integrity; Someone could easily loophole things. Even though the staff can work it, some day it will fall apart on them

I think are staff are smart enough to make sure it doesn't. They make the decisions about how to run the server so let them be.